Shvayba Dzmitriy Nikolaevich. Coordination of economic Interest in the Mechanism of social and economic Security

Образец ссылки на эту статью: Shvayba Dzmitriy Nikolaevich. Coordination of economic Interest in the Mechanism of social and economic Security // Бизнес и дизайн ревю. 2019. № 3 (15). С. 4.

УДК 338.2(476)+316.42(476)

Shvayba Dzmitriy Nikolaevich

COORDINATION OF ECONOMIC INTERESTS IN THE MECHANISM OF SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SECURITY

The Minsk regional organization of the Belarusian trade Union of workers of chemical, mining and petroleum industries, Minsk, Belarus (220140, St. Ciurlionis 8-37), candidate of economic Sciences, member of the State Expert Council of the State Committee for science and technologies of Republic of Belarus, doctoral student of Belarusian national technical University, ORCID: 0000-0001-6783-9765, shvabia@tut.by, +375 29 652 06 03.

Abstract. Economic experience in the situation of «open» economy shows that the coordination of complex structured interests is performed by means of the formation of areas in which the implementation of interests is performed by the total vector. For their description and generalized properties introduced into scientific use the concept of «coincident interest». The design of the matching interest is mobile, usually changing under the influence of the evolving in any case the composition of the needs and their carriers, and even the subject composition of the external environment. For the first time at the interstate level, the concept of "concurrent interest" was applied in the CIS political documents. In particular, it was determined that the key task of the CIS is the implementation of the coinciding interest by the method of formation of mutually beneficial, multilateral cooperation of the member States. At the moment, this field of coincidence of state interests is formed, for example, ensuring stable and progressive social and economic development of States within the framework of the common financial and economic space.

Key words: socio-economic security; the government; society; enterprise; employee; threat; security; interests; Economics, analysis, system.

Швайба Дмитрий Николаевич

СОГЛАСОВАНИЕ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИХ ИНТЕРЕСОВ В МЕХАНИЗМЕ ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЯ СОЦИАЛЬНО-ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЙ БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ

Минская областная организация Белорусского профсоюза работников химической, горной и нефтяной отраслей промышленности, Минск, Беларусь (220140, г. Минск, ул. Чюрлениса 8-37), кандидат экономических наук, член Государственного экспертного совета Государственного комитета по науке и технологиям Республики Беларусь, докторант Белорусского национального технического университета, ORCID: 0000-0001-6783-9765, shvabia@tut.by, +375 29 652 06 03.

Аннотация. Хозяйственный опыт в ситуации «открытой» экономики демонстрирует, что согласование сложноструктурированных интересов исполняется при помощи формирования областей, в коих осуществление интересов исполняется по совокупному вектору. Для их описания и обобщенной свойства введено в научный оборот понятие «совпадающего интереса». Конструкция совпадающего интереса подвижна, меняется как правило под действием складывающейся в любом случае композиции потребностей и их носителей, а еще субъектного состава наружной среды. В первый раз на межгосударственном уровне понятие «совпадающего интереса» было применено в политических документах СНГ. В частности, было определено, что ключевая задача СНГ - это осуществление совпадающего интереса методом формирования взаимовыгодного, многостороннего сотрудничества государств- членов. На текущий момент складывается данное поле совпадения государственных интересов, к примеру, обеспечивание стойкого и поступательного социально-экономического развития государств в рамках общего финансово-экономического пространства.

Ключевые слова: социально-экономическая защищенность; государство; общество; предприятие; работник; угроза; защищенность; интересы; экономика, анализ, система.

As the analysis demonstrated, the adaptive and corrective abilities of the mechanism of ensuring socio-economic security are determined by the presence of a special element base, which actualizes the tasks of the defense system and implements their solution. The implementation of these probabilities is based on properties of interaction with the outer environment [9, р. 20]. The necessary communication base is guided by the principles that make it possible to take into account a large number of indicators of the external environment, covering the structure and methods of coordination of inter-subject financial and economic interests. The maneuverability of the economy depends on how positive the design of interests is. This point is especially significant in the criteria of its growth, because at this time, we are implementing investment projects focused on intense involvement with foreign Finance [3, p. 37; 4, p. 59]. The analysis showed that traders who possess financial "power" and organize work on the network principle are ready to counteract the implementation of state financial and economic interests. The messages for the difficulties of incomplete realization of financial and economic interests are formed in the financial and economic environment and are both subjective and objective (table 1.).

Economic experience in the situation of an" open " economy shows that the coordination of complex structured interests is performed by forming areas in which the implementation of interests is performed on the aggregate vector. For their description and General properties introduced in the scientific use the term "coincident interest". The design of the coinciding interest is mobile, changes as a rule under the influence of the composition of needs and their carriers developing in any case, and also subject structure of the external environment. For the first time at the interstate level, the concept of "concurrent interest" was applied in the political documents of the CIS. In particular, it was determined that the key task of the CIS is the implementation of the coinciding interest by the method of formation of mutually beneficial, multilateral cooperation of the member States. At the moment this field of coincidence of the state interests, for example, ensuring steady and progressive social and economic development of the States within the General financial and economic space develops.

Table 1.

Differentiation of the main prerequisites for restrictions in the implementation of financial and economic interests



Source: author's development based on data [2; 6; 7; 8]

In theory, the description of the situations of correlation of financial and economic interests, which determine the probability of both their confrontation and coordination, includes the provisions of the concept of choice of common behavior of subjects. According to the concept, the preparation of the "conflict area" may be qualified by the presented symptoms:

- economic interests are concentrated in the General sphere (the field of the external environment);

- there are financial and economic constraints that prevent the Autonomous realization of the interests of all subjects there (for example, a limited volume of commodity markets, exhaustion of resources);

- economic or other significant effect can be obtained by a limited number of subjects on a competitive basis;

- full implementation of the financial and economic interest of the 1st or several subjects causes the impossibility of realization of all other subjects being there.

The symptoms of the formation of the incident area, in essence, are reduced to the messages of reducing the completeness of the implementation of interests. But this does not mean that confrontation and conflict of interest are inevitable. As confirmed by researchers in the field of conflictology, the incident appears as a consequence of hidden and obvious contradictions between the subjects and develops if there is no consensus between the parties [1; 2]. The conclusion is confirmed by the focus on increasing the size of corporate and common interests implemented in the financial and economic system at the stage of its recovery [3; 5; 10].

The properties of the situation in which the "area of convergence" of interests is likely to arise are summarized as follows:

- concentration of financial and economic interests in one (General) area of the external environment;

- the presence of a probable or real danger that can have an equally bad impact on the interests of all the subjects there (General threat);

- possible auxiliary effect for anyone involved in the coordination of the strategy for the implementation of their financial and economic interests;

- main active constraints can be overcome with concerted acts.

In the situational assessment, it is essential to qualify the correlation of" areas of coincidence of interests "and"formation of a corporate structure". The essence is that the corporate structure is formed as an organization structured according to the network principle, which is aimed at inter-subject interaction through stable communication channels, in connection with which the consistency of activities in the financial and economic field is achieved. "Area of mutual interests" of unstructured or substructurenotify. Her presence shows after which the structuring has the ability to be perfect, if it is a benefit included in its membership the speakers of personifitsirovano interest, but has the ability to "disintegrate" if missing connecting points.

In addition, attention is drawn to the precedent that the differentiation of categories that reflect the consistency of financial and economic interests is comparative, because in the process of realization of interests have all chances to disappear formed and formed fresh motives for coordination and conflict of interests. But if the field of coordination of interests develops outside the legal field of the state, it is assessed as a cause of danger of socio-economic security.

Table 2.

Characteristics of complex structured financial and economic interests



Source: elaboration of author

The properties of structuring financial and economic interests, reflecting the premises for the coordination of interests as a method of implementing the structural stability of the economy are summarized in table 2.

For the description of the complex structured financial and economic interests given in the table, the categories that reflect inter-subject relations caused by the processes of internationalization of the industrial sector and globalization of the economy are applied. As demonstrated by the financial and economic practice, to resolve the problems preventing the effective working of the constituent entities or is able to provide identical negative impact on any of the entities is also likely to brief the Union of conflicting interests. In other words, the presence of a joint danger or threat is considered to be a necessary unifying soil. The aggregate factor characteristic of the interests listed in the above table is their stability, which a priori implies belonging to the area of coincidence of interests. In this situation, the balance of interests represented by a complex structure or the presence of points of convergence can be achieved in a "natural" way, without the intervention of the country. This event makes sense to take into account when solving the problem of forming the components of self-organization in the environment and the structure of the economy, as well as in the management of the financial and economic interests of the system of its defense.

The acquired facts presented an opportunity to create a methodology that aims to determine the data and criteria for the formation of areas of convergence of interests in the financial and economic environment.

The method of coordination of inter-subject financial and economic interests is designed to assess the susceptibility of economic entities to control actions on the elements of the economy and the formation of the communication section to strengthen its links with the external environment. The assessment is proposed to implement 2-um vectors: presence of common interests and of conformity between the method of matching interests to characteristics of the represented region.

Approval of financial and economic interests receives a positive assessment if one of criteria of coincidence of interests is carried out and the method of coordination meets features of area of coincidence of interests.

To determine the areas of coincidence of interests, a test of the criteria of coincidence of interests is performed. The following are taken as initial points:

- the presence of a joint threat;

- the presence of co-benefits;

- "balance of benefits."

These circumstances are considered to be mutually exclusive. The relative denotations of the values taken to establish the area of coincidence of interests are given in table 3.

Table 3.

Relative indicator designations

Source: elaboration of author

The measurement of the gain or harm from the realization of interests in any case is guided by the matrix of characteristics of the outcome of the coordination of interests. The assessment of the total coincidence of interests is given in the quadrants of the matrix (table 4).

Table 4.

Matrix of economic indicators of the result of coordination of interests*

Note: * the assessment of indicators on the factors of coincidence of interests is given on the basis of the optimistic scenario

Source: elaboration of author

When checking the implementation of the above criteria, it is mandatory to provide that the benefit from the implementation of the separate and common interests does not infringe on the state interests. It can be assumed that the implementation of both separate and common interests is agreed on the vector of state interests.

The lead match field is added up if:

  1. The potential of joint danger is higher than the gain from the realization of separate interests and the harm from the realization of common interests:

ПОу > ВПи; ПОу > УСи.                                     (1) 

  1. The gain from collectively realized interests is higher than the gain from the realization of separate interests,

ВСи > ВПи.                                          (2) 

  1. The gain from the collectively realized interests is no more than the gain from the realization of separate interests, but there is a risk of harm from the implementation of alternative separate interests of other entities,

ВСи = ВПи; УПи > ВПи.                              (3)

The method of coordination of interests is proposed to choose from 2 alternatives:

- coordination of activities for the implementation of concurrent interests that do not require registration, or the creation of an organizational structure (temporarily functioning or permanent). In the second case, the choice is executed by the presence of the unifying interests of the base (the formation of a collective or joint interest). The selection includes the properties of the area of interest overlap:

- disunity or the agreement of the implementation objects of interest;

- scale (volume) of objects of realization of interests;

- concentration (plurality) of separate interests in the field of;

- stability of separate and coinciding interests.

To account for these indicators need to enter the presence of the one of the implementation objects of interest, their scope and mobility (variability). On this basis, it is possible to take one of the conclusions:

  1. The decision on coordination of activities on realization of common interests. It is accepted if the field of coinciding interests is unbalanced: the object of realization of interests is subject to sharp changes, the direction of which is difficult to predict.
  2. Decision on the formation of common interests. It is based on the fact that there is a single object of realization of interests, which is determined on the basis of the specificity of entrepreneurial activity and the exact industry affiliation.
  3. The decision to establish a corporate structure. Made in case of disconnection of the implementation objects of interest, the unavailability of single-industry affiliation, but the resistance win for all involved from realization of matching interests, abilities design and structuring persistent communications [11; 12].

The use of the method for situational assessment of correlation of inter-subject interests will provide an opportunity to develop economically sound proposals on the participation of external entities in the implementation of state tasks. At the same time, situational assessment is not limited to the reasons for the coordination of interests. The field of incident besides is obliged to be defined by means of system of financial and economic characteristics. But the development of this absolutely necessary to ensure the socio-economic security of the problem is a promising pre-set of various scientific areas and asks for special tools, the creation of which was not included in the objectives of this study. Thus, the regulation of the structure of inter-subject financial and economic interests is considered to be a necessary part of the instrumental assistance of the system of ensuring socio-economic security.

Литература

  1. Бабосов Е.М. Конфликтология: учеб. пособие / Е. М. Бабосов. Минск: ТераСистемс, 2000. 461 с.
  2. Бабосов Е.М. Социология личности, стратификации и управления / Е.М. Бабосов. Минск : Белорус. наука, 2006. 590 с.
  3. Безопасность личности и социума как основа совместной социальной политики государства и общества: современное гражданское общество и социальная безопасность: сб. ст. / Обществ. палата Рос. Федерации [и др.]; отв. ред. И. Я. Богданов. М.: Норма, 2015. 159 с.
  4. Болдырев В.Н. Генезис социально-экономических проблем безопасности института собственности / В. Н. Болдырев. Воронеж: Воронеж. Экономико-правовой ин-т, 2015. 90 с.
  5. Национальная экономика России: потенциалы, комплексы, экономическая безопасность: учебник / В.И. Волков [и др.]; под ред. В. И. Лисова. М.: Экономика, 2000. 476 с.
  6. Прогноз развития межрегиональных продовольственных сырьевых связей и совершенствование внутриреспубликанского разделения труда / Академия аграрных наук Республики Беларусь, Белорус. научно исследовательский ин-т аграрной экономики; авт.-сост.: В. Г. Гусаков [и др.]. Минск: БелНИИ аграрной экономики, 2000. 129 с.
  7. Ибрагимов М.И. Некоторые проблемы правового регулирования операций ТНК на национальном и мирохозяйственном уровнях // Экономика XXI века. 2006. № 4. С. 3–16.
  8. Колупаев В.А. Формирование концепции национальной экономической безопасности в зарубежных странах // Белорусская экономика: анализ, прогноз, регулирование. № 12. С. 2–9.
  9. Кутукова Е.С. Показатели экономической безопасности страны: качество жизни // Вестник международного института экономики и права. 2016. № 3. С. 19–25.
  10. Сапунцов А.Л. Транснациональные корпорации развивающихся стран в мировой экономике // Российский внешнеэкономический вестник. 2006. № 4. С. 16–22.
  11. Shvaiba D. Dynamic regression models of forecasting indicators of social and economic security // Бюллетень науки и практики. Т. 5. №1. С. 249-257. Режим доступа: http://www.bulletennauki.com/38-53 (дата обращения 15.01.2019). DOI: 10.5281/ zenodo.2539763
  12. Shvaiba D. (2018). Socio-economic security of the hierarchical system. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 4(6), 248-254. Режим доступа: http://www.bulletennauki.com/shvaiba-d-n (дата обращения06.2018). DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1289862.

References

  1. Babosov E.M. Konfliktologiya: ucheb. posobie / E. M. Babosov. Minsk: TeraSistems, 2000. 461 p.
  2. Babosov E.M. Sotsiologiya lichnosti, stratifikatsii i upravleniya / E.M. Babosov. Minsk: Belorus. nauka, 2006. 590 p.
  3. Bezopasnost lichnosti i sotsiuma kak osnova sovmestnoy sotsialnoy politiki gosudarstva i obschestva: sovremennoe grazhdanskoe obschestvo i sotsialnaya bezopasnost: sb. st. / Obschestv. palata Ros. Federatsii [i dr.]; otv. red. I. YA. Bogdanov. M.: Norma, 2015. 159 p.
  4. Boldyrev V.N. Genezis sotsialno-ekonomicheskikh problem bezopasnosti instituta sobstvennosti / V. N. Boldyrev. Voronezh: Voronezh. Ekonomiko-pravovoy in-t, 2015. 90 p.
  5. Natsionalnaya ekonomika Rossii: potentsialy, kompleksy, ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost: uchebnik / V.I. Volkov [i dr.]; pod red. V. I. Lisova. M.: Ekonomika, 2000. 476 p.
  6. Prognoz razvitiya mezhregionalnykh prodovolstvennykh syrevykh svyazey i sovershenstvovanie vnutrirespublikanskogo razdeleniya truda / Akademiya agrarnykh nauk Respubliki Belarus, Belorus. nauchno issledovatelskiy in-t agrarnoy ekonomiki; avt.-sost.: V. G. Gusakov [i dr.]. Minsk: BelNII agrarnoy ekonomiki, 2000. 129 p.
  7. Ibragimov M.I. Nekotorye problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya operatsiy TNK na natsionalnom i mirokhozyaystvennom urovnyakh - Ekonomika XXI veka. 2006. no 4. pp. 3–16.
  8. Kolupaev V.A. Formirovanie kontseptsii natsionalnoy ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti v zarubezhnykh stranakh - Belorusskaya ekonomika: analiz, prognoz, regulirovanie. 2002. no 12. pp. 2–9.
  9. Kutukova E.S. Pokazateli ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti strany: kachestvo zhizni - Vestnik mezhdunarodnogo instituta ekonomiki i prava. 2016. no 3. pp. 19–25.
  10. Sapuntsov A.L. Transnatsionalnye korporatsii razvivayuschikhsya stran v mirovoy ekonomike - Rossiyskiy vneshneekonomicheskiy vestnik. 2006. no 4. pp. 16–22.
  11. Shvaiba D. Dynamic regression models of forecasting indicators of social and economic security - Byulleten nauki i praktiki. 2019. T. 5. №1. S. 249-257. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.bulletennauki.com/38-53 (data obrascheniya 15.01.2019). DOI: 10.5281/ zenodo.2539763.
  12. Shvaiba D. (2018). Socio-economic security of the hierarchical system. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 4(6), 248-254. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.bulletennauki.com/shvaiba-d-n (data obrascheniya 15.06.2018). DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1289862.

Рецензент:

Мальцева Е.С. – кандидат экономических наук, доцент, АНО ВО «Институт бизнеса и дизайна».

Работа поступила в редакцию: 28.01.2019 г.